Wednesday, 13 February 2019

It is never ethical to create something, an entity or AI for sale that may one day have rights.

Talking with my kids today over dinner, we were chatting about whether it should it be ethical to create something that should have rights? While in that form it might be tricky to answer objectively a very clear cut secondary question arose.

"Should it be ethical to sell something, an entity or 'intelligence' that may, one day, have rights?"

The answer is clearly NO.

And from that

This should be a Basic Law of AI Ethics:

**It is never ethical to create something, an entity or AI for sale that may one day have rights.**

This is pretty obvious but seems to have been ignored by AI commentators excited about humanoid robots and entities - at least in this simple form so far.

Note that that is different from surrogate parenting where the surrogate is not selling the entity (i.e. the child), but is being paid to help in part of its 'upbringing'.

#ethics #rights #AI #robot

2 comments:

  1. I always have a minimum of 3 trays going, but I don't tend to do a shot a day. I add some to a smoothie, do a shot every other day, add some to a salad, etc. You can consume the second growth of your wheatgrass, but I have heard it is lacking in some nutrients, so I normally compost it after it is all cut.
    Jogo quente 2019
    360 jogos gratis
    friv 4 school Games for kids 2019

    ReplyDelete
  2. At the time, I was attracted to my future husband for his cool composure under pressure and his decisiveness. He said he was initially attracted to me for my warmth and vulnerability. Describing those same characteristics at our tenth wedding anniversary, I think I called him “cold and controlling” and he called me “neurotic.” At our divorce, we agreed that he had enough of my vulnerability and I’d had enough of his decisiveness to last a lifetime.
    kizi
    games online for kids
    friv game 2019

    ReplyDelete